Yes, I figured doing a trace and see how things happen would answer a lot of questions. So, I'll try that.
>From looking at the DefaultActionProxy constructor, it does make sense to start with the actionproxy. The proxy gets an action invocation as a constructor parameter. So the invocation instantiation should be coming shortly after that. On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Musachy Barroso<musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > The best way to find out all these things is to put breakpoints in the > constructor and/or the setter methods. > > musachy > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dimitrios > Christodoulakis<dimi....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> According to the XWork feature description, >> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/wikidocs/XWork%20Features.html, the >> ActionInvocation represents the execution state of an action holding >> the action instance and the interceptors. >> >> I have been looking at >> http://struts.apache.org/2.1.6/struts2-core/apidocs and examining an >> implementation of the ActionInvocation interface: >> DefaultActionInvocation and was wondering how does this class gets a >> hold of the action instance and the interceptors? It has relevant >> fields like action, interceptors and proxy with getters for the action >> and the proxy. But it is not straightforward to me how the action >> instance (and the interceptors) are injected to it.. I didn't see >> setter methods for the action. >> >> My motivation for this question comes also from wanting to unit test >> an interceptor's intercept(ActionInvocation actionInvocation) method. >> I will need to pass an ActionInvocation as a parameter, which then the >> interceptor will use to extract the actual action instance from. >> (Among other things, like the InvocationContext to get the session). >> >> So I was also wondering how to provide a mock-type of an >> ActionInvocation which will contain a mock action, a mock session etc. >> I mean I understand how to create a mock action and a mock session map >> with some parameters in it, but how do I bind those to a mock >> ActionInvocation? Would I need perhaps to start with a mock >> ActionProxy? >> >> Thanks for your advice. This will help me design the test case and >> also learn more about the struts2 mechanics. >> Regards! >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
