I don't think it's a matter of XD2 being stable, it's more a matter of it being incomplete. We're using XD2 for our Hibernate objects, but we're forced to use XD1 for our Stateless Session EJBs. I was a bit frustrated when I found out that the EJB plugin wasn't finished yet. I assumed that since it was on the list of plugins, it was at least usable. It's Not, and I wasted a several hours finding this out. I'd like to see a list of which plugins are in a usable state, and which ones aren't. Some more errata documentation would good as well. Other than that, XD2 is heaps better than XD1. Good work guys.
-----Original Message----- From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 18 October 2005 1:37 AM To: [email protected]; karthik Guru Subject: Re: [xdoclet-user] curious about link from codehaus.org --- karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When i pointed my colleague to xdoclet.codehaus.org > ,he asked me as to why is'nt there a direct link to > the product website from codehaus? > This irks me too :) > I mean it gives an impression as though XDoclet2 > is'nt stable yet which we know is not true. It is product website... Unfortunately guys maintaining XD1 site stil have statement there that XD2 is unstable. YOu may also apply some pressure.... ( I raised JIRA issue but no answer yet... ) regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org __________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/ This correspondence is for the named persons only. It may contain confidential or privileged information or both. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mis transmission. If you receive this correspondence in error please delete it from your system immediately and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or relay on any part of this correspondence, if you are not the intended recipient. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender expressly, and with the authority, states them to be the opinions of the Department of Emergency Services, Queensland.
