--- "Johnston, Brendan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
> Does anyone have any suggestions of either different
> annotations or
> modifications to the hibernate xdoclet source to get
> a joined subclass
> to have a two column key?
At present, no. ( Just verified with source , and I
consider this kind of a bug )
> I want to create xml like this:
>
> ...
>
> <joined-subclass name="model.Derived">
> <key>
> <column name="k1" />
> <column name="k2" />
> </key>
> ...
> </joined-subclass>
> ...
>
>
> I tried this:
>
> /** @hibernate.joined-subclass
> * @hibernate.joined-subclass-key
> * @hibernate.key-column name="k1"
> * @hibernate.key-column name="k2"
> * */
> public class Derived extends Base {
>
> But got this:
>
> <joined-subclass name="model.Derived">
> <key/>
> </joined-subclass>
>
>
>
> Any suggestions on my use of annotations, or changes
> to the jelly
> implementation would be very welcome.
>
> Critiques of the database design are valid, but are
> less useful.
Does handcrafted hibernate mapping work? I read
docs, and there is nothing about several columns (
though DTD allows this ) :
----------------%<--------------------
No discriminator column is required for this mapping
strategy. Each subclass must, however, declare a table
column holding the object identifier using the <key>
element.
----------------%<--------------------
Single column discriminator ( as column="whatever"
would work )
Is your object identifier by chance composite?
regards,
----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality.
check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org
__________________________________
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
