Thanks James. Passing the smart proxy callbacks was the piece I am looking for. Any roadmap for when this might get in?
Should I just use Lingo? Thanks SC James.Strachan wrote: > > 2009/3/10 Scott Clasen <scott.cla...@hbo.com>: >> >> Are there plans to support Lingo style async request-reply in any >> upcoming >> release of Camel? >> >> From some older posts it looks like there may have been a plan to get it >> in >> eventually but this dosent seem to be in 1.6.0. > > Ultimately yes. > > Camel already supports asynchronous method invocations using > annotations to denote operations which are one-way async method calls > using the @InOnly annotation - see this page for more details... > http://camel.apache.org/using-exchange-pattern-annotations.html > > the missing piece of the functionality that Lingo supports is being > able to deal with conversation lifecycles and using smart proxies for > passing listener parameters to methods; we don't yet support such a > thing. For example if you wanted to register a listener to events on a > remote server and be invoked back with events until the listener is > 'closed'. > > However to purely invoke a service asynchronously, that works fine now > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lingo-Style-Async-Request-Reply-tp22442218p22454609.html Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.