I just read excellent tutorial at 
http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-osgi-faq.html, and have a question.
 
My osgi application is composed of 124 bundles when deployed in Karaf, if I 
deploy all dependent .jars as thier own bundles. When I only put an asterisk 
(*) in the <Export-Package> tag of the maven-bundle-plugin, I noticed the 
following actions occured:
1) all dependent jars were unpacked and packaged inside of my application's 
bundle,
2) the "Import-Package" and "Export-Package" referred to all of the new 
packages in my app's bundle, including those of my application.
 
Now that's all good, because it should decrease the bundles I'll need to deploy 
from 124 down to 1, and it will make my features.xml file much smaller.  
However, when deploying the new bundle inside of Karaf (1.4.0), I got 
constraint violations for all of the items in my Import-Package portion of the 
MANIFEST.MF file. I guess imports get resolved before anything is exported.  
 
Is there a way to keep the functionality listed above, and have karaf recognize 
that my package already contains the packages it needs, and doesn't need to 
look in OSGi for them?  The answer would seem to be to do something like
<Import-Package>!*</Import-Package>, which appears to be contrary to OSGI.
 
So, my question is, is there a preferred way to accomplish this?
 
Mike Van, PMP, CSM, WTF?
################################################################################
If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender
immediately and be aware that the use, copying, or dissemination of 
this information is prohibited. This email transmission contains 
information from NCI Information Systems, Inc. that may be considered 
privileged or confidential and is intended solely for the named 
recipient.
################################################################################

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to