Clement,

I'm glad you're considering it - it would be really useful. Do you have any
idea of when iPOJO 2.0 would be released? Is it 6 months? A year?

/Bengt

2010/9/9 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]>

> Hi,
>
> You it is a really good feature. I'm thinking to that one since 1 year now.
> Despite I've an idea how to implement this support, it is an important
> change probably postponed until iPOJO 2.0.
> Supporting method callbacks is easy but supporting field injection on
> parent classes is really more tricky.
>
> Regards,
>
> Clement
>
>
> On 09.09.2010, at 09:26, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
>
> > I have the exact same problem. I have generic classes (in a framework)
> that
> > do most boilerplate stuff and the intention is to make it simple to add
> sub
> > classes with specific needs (most often adding service properties and
> logic)
> > - but I can't. I have to copy/paste all the boilerplate code to every
> > subclass.
> >
> > I would really like inheritance support for the annotations too.
> >
> > /Bengt
> >
> > 2010/9/9 Joel Schuster <[email protected]>
> >
> >>
> >> It seems that iPojo doesn't know how to go up the inheritance tree to
> look
> >> for annotations. So if I wish to have an abstract class that has the
> >> @Provides or @Component or even the @Validate/@Invalidate method because
> a
> >> bunch of them implement things in the same way I cannot.
> >>
> >> Am I correct?
> >>
> >> - Joel Schuster
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to