We're using camel as the base framework (I assume we're using nearly 40%
of the features - wich is pretty much compared to the richness of
camel ;) in an application with more than 20 bundles in felix. That was
no easy way to get it up and running, but it works. Wath I want to say: 

- yes, camel works well in an OSGi environment
- no, it's not simple to get it running yet
- yes, I think it could be easier (but I've no masterplan how to get it
easier ;)
- and yes, camel is so cool, that it is worth the effort :)

Claus

Am Dienstag, den 14.09.2010, 16:42 -0400 schrieb Donald Whytock:
> If I understand the term properly, my network layer is IP.
> 
> Looking at Camel...Does it play well with OSGi?  It looks like the
> sort of thing that would have cross-classloader issues.
> 
> Don
> 
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Alex Karasulu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> FWIW, I've blogged about something slightly related that I did a few months
> >> ago:
> >>
> >> http://gnodet.blogspot.com/2009/10/jira-notification-system-for-irc-using.html
> >> It's only slightly related as the aim wasn't to provide a real chat
> >> bot, but using
> >> Camel on top of Karaf made things really easy to do.
> >> Camel is something you may want to look at...
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 17:52, Donald Whytock <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > A few months back I'd thought about submitting my Chatterbot project
> >> > to the incubator.  Now that I have a fully functional prototype I'm
> >> > considering instead offering it as a Felix subproject.
> >> >
> >> > Chatterbot is built on Felix, designed to accept messages over a
> >> > variety of protocols and submit them to command processors.  This
> >> > could serve as a remote-access framework, a chat responder, a chat
> >> > lurker, a cross-protocol message forwarder, and so on.  The project
> >> > wiki is at http://www.imtower.net/chatterbot
> >> >
> >> > My thought for adding this as a Felix subproject is that the bundles
> >> > for handling protocols can be generalized to be used outside of
> >> > Chatterbot.  The same may be true for the command-processor bundles.
> >> >
> >> > Your thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > Don
> >>
> >
> > Add to this list looking at MINA as well. What are you using for your
> > network layer?
> >
> > --
> > Alex Karasulu
> > My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
> > Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
> > Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
> > To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to