On 5/11/12 12:46 , matias san martin wrote:
Thank you for your answer and recommendation,Richard.

Just to be sure, when "navigating" the requirements "by hand" (with the logic 
you recommend), is possible that some bundles disappear (get uninstalled) while processing, isn't 
it? If so, is there any recommended way of reacting to this case? I would like to be sure that I 
get a valid snapshot of the closure (even if the bundles are not the current revision).

Yeah, you probably do have to worry about it. You effectively would need to listen for the bundle you are calculating dependencies for to be refreshed. If it gets refreshed while calculating, then your result is invalid and you need to start again.

Of course, this is all pretty silly anyway, because if you have a high level of churn, the result can be invalid as soon as you finish calculating. This is true even when using the getDependencyClosure() method. We are really just talking about consistent snapshot, not something that is valid for any length of time.

-> richard

Thank you again for your insightsKind regards

________________________________
De: Richard S. Hall<[email protected]>
Para: [email protected]
Enviado: jueves, 10 de mayo de 2012 23:26
Asunto: Re: getting bundle's closure by using 
FrameworkWiring.getDependencyClosure

Right. This only tells you which bundles depend on the target bundle, not on 
which bundles it depends.

This mechanism is intended to answer the question: "If I refresh the target bundle, 
which other bundles will be impacted?"

If no one depends on your bundle, then no on will be impacted.

If you want to calculate it the other way around, it shouldn't be too 
difficult. Just get your BundleWiring and walk all of your required wires to 
their providers, then do this recursively for them.

->  richard

On 5/10/12 19:47 , Matias SM wrote:
Looking to this example and trying it in my case I think I understand what is 
going wrong.
If I run the commands you show, I get:
g! ((bundle 0) adapt ((bundle 0) loadClass 
org.osgi.framework.wiring.FrameworkWiring)) getDependencyClosure [ (bundle 9) ]
      9|Resolved   |    1|mybundle_symboicname (1.0.0)

g! inspect c *package 9
mybundle_symboicname[9] provides:
-------------------------------------------
*package [EMPTY]

If I understand correctly this output, It is what I'd have expected since 
myBundle doesn't have any capability.
The thing is that I would expect that the Dependency Closure would also contain 
the bundles related to myBundle's requirements. I think I may misunderstood the 
documentation:
...The graph is expanded by adding any bundle that is either wired to a package 
that is currently exported by a bundle in the graph or __requires a bundle in 
the graph__...

 From that last part I thought that the bundles wired to myBundle by its 
requirements would also be in the dependency closure.
If that is not the case, is there a way to get the bundles wired to myBundle by 
its requirements (and the requirements of those bundles, and so on...)?

Thank you again for your help
Kind regards

On 10/05/12 20:32, Richard S. Hall wrote:
Just as a follow up, I see something like this:

g! lb
START LEVEL 1
     ID|State      |Level|Name
      0|Active     |    0|System Bundle (4.1.0.SNAPSHOT)
      1|Active     |    1|uninstaller (0.0.0)
      3|Active     |    1|Apache Felix Gogo Command (0.12.0)
      4|Active     |    1|Apache Felix Gogo Runtime (0.10.0)
      5|Active     |    1|Apache Felix Gogo Shell (0.10.0)
g! ((bundle 0) adapt ((bundle 0) loadClass 
org.osgi.framework.wiring.FrameworkWiring)) getDependencyClosure [ (bundle 4) ]
      5|Active     |    1|org.apache.felix.gogo.shell (0.10.0)
      4|Active     |    1|org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime (0.10.0)
      3|Active     |    1|org.apache.felix.gogo.command (0.12.0)

g! inspect c *package 4
org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [4] provides:
-------------------------------------------
osgi.wiring.package; org.apache.felix.service.command 0.10.0 required by:
     org.apache.felix.gogo.shell [5]
     org.apache.felix.gogo.command [3]
osgi.wiring.package; org.apache.felix.gogo.api 0.10.0 [UNUSED]
osgi.wiring.package; org.apache.felix.service.threadio 0.10.0 [UNUSED]
g!

This looks correct, but there could always be bugs, I guess.

->  richard

On 5/10/12 19:19 , Matias SM wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to get a bundle's dependency closure by using the method 
getDependencyClosure. However if I do sth like:
context.getBundle(0).adapt(FrameworkWiring.class).getDependencyClosure(Arrays.asList(myBundle));
to get myBundle's closure, all this call is returning is the bundle (myBundle) 
itself.

 From getDependencyClosure javadoc:
/Returns the dependency closure for the specified bundles.
A graph of bundles is computed starting with the specified bundles. The graph 
is expanded by adding any bundle that is either wired to a package that is 
currently exported by a bundle in the graph or requires a bundle in the graph. 
The graph is fully constructed when there is no bundle outside the graph that 
is wired to a bundle in the graph. The graph may contain UNINSTALLED bundles 
that are removal pending./

I understand that the result of the previously cited call should be all the 
bundles wired (by a requirement or a capability) to myBundle.
What am I doing wrong?

And I would like to ask you also if there is a way of getting only the closure 
formed by the bundles wired to myBundle by its requirements (i.e. only get 
those bundles that are needed to resolve myBundle).

Thanks in advance for any help you can kindly give me
Kind regards

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to