Hi, On 3 déc. 2013, at 10:06, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've now tested against trunk and I've come a lot further. Another question > for you... > > I need access to my service object in the getServiceReferences() method. It > is possible if I have the BundleContext. In the accept() method I get the > BundleContext passed as a parameter but not in the getServiceReferences(). > Why is that? > > How can I access the service object from the ServiceReference in the > getServiceReferences() method? Perhaps the signature of the > getServiceReferences() method should be changed to take a BundleContext as > well? You can retrieve the bundle context from the dependency model: BundleContext bc = model.getComponentInstance().getContext(); Regards, Clement > > /Bengt > > > 2013/11/29 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> > >> Thanks Clement. I'll check out trunk and see how far I'll get. >> >> /Bengt >> >> >> 2013/11/29 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi, >>> On 29 nov. 2013, at 16:21, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Clement! >>>> >>>> I compared our code it turns out I had a type: I had specified the >>> handler >>>> to "org.apache.felix.ipojo.properties" instead of >>>> "org.apache.felix.ipojo:properties".. I had a period instead of a colon. >>>> That explains my NPE. >>> >>> I probably did a mistake while explaining. The syntax is >>> namespace:handlername. >>> >>>> >>>> Now I can also retrieve the property. I can also call the getValue() >>> method >>>> that returns the value in "toString" format. Can't get the >>> getObjectValue() >>>> to work though. Looking forward to the new getCurrentValue() method. >>> >>> Unfortunately the getObjectValue only work for immutable properties. >>> >>>> >>>> Is it just the org.apache.felix.ipojo artifact I need to check out and >>>> build on trunk? >>> >>> The following version contains the new method: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix.ipojo/1.11.1-SNAPSHOT/org.apache.felix.ipojo-1.11.1-20131129.182110-3.jar >>> >>> Clement >>> >>>> >>>> /Bengt >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/11/29 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I’ve done some testing: >>>>> >>>>> 1) I’m able to retrieve the properties >>>>> 2) I’m not able to retrieve the value >>>>> >>>>> Here is my accept method: >>>>> >>>>> @Override >>>>> public <S> TransformedServiceReference<S> accept(DependencyModel >>>>> dependency, BundleContext context, TransformedServiceReference<S> ref) >>> { >>>>> ConfigurationHandlerDescription h = >>>>> (ConfigurationHandlerDescription) >>>>> dependency.getComponentInstance().getInstanceDescription() >>>>> >>>>> .getHandlerDescription("org.apache.felix.ipojo:properties"); >>>>> >>>>> if (h == null) { >>>>> return null; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> PropertyDescription description = >>> h.getPropertyByName(“extenders"); >>>>> if (description == null) { >>>>> return null; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> System.out.println(description.getValue() + " / " + >>>>> Arrays.toString( >>>>> (String[]) description.getCurrentValue())); >>>>> >>>>> return ref; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> I’ve added the getCurrentValue() to PropertyDescription to retrieve the >>>>> current property value (gonna commit this ASAP). >>>>> (full code here: https://gist.github.com/cescoffier/7705901) >>>>> >>>>> Clement >>>>> >>>>> On 28 nov. 2013, at 15:06, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/11/28 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28 nov. 2013, at 14:36, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Clement, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I changed to the following line: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PropertyDescription[] propDescs = >>>>>>>> configHandlerDescription.getProperties(); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But I still get an NPE. Have you tried to call these methods from >>>>> within >>>>>>> an >>>>>>>> interceptor? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not this method, but I did something pretty similar. Will >>> investigate to >>>>>>> see why you get an NPE. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Clement >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /Bengt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2013/11/28 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 28 nov. 2013, at 12:17, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello again Clement! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I was away on business yesterday which is why I'm late replying. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've come a bit further now but still have problems accessing my >>>>>>>>>> component's "extenders" property. Here is what my code looks like >>>>> now: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * public List<ServiceReference> >>> getServiceReferences(DependencyModel >>>>>>>>>> theDependencyModel,* >>>>>>>>>> * List<ServiceReference> theMatching) {* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * ComponentInstance instance = >>>>>>>>>> theDependencyModel.getComponentInstance();* >>>>>>>>>> * InstanceDescription instanceDescription = >>>>>>>>>> instance.getInstanceDescription();* >>>>>>>>>> * ComponentTypeDescription componentTypeDescription = >>>>>>>>>> instanceDescription.getComponentDescription();* >>>>>>>>>> * String factoryName = >>>>>>>>>> componentTypeDescription.getFactory().getFactoryName();* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * if (FACTORY_NAME.equals(factoryName)) {* >>>>>>>>>> * System.out.println("Found a GenericService2");* >>>>>>>>>> * ConfigurationHandlerDescription configHandlerDescription = >>>>>>>>>> (ConfigurationHandlerDescription) instanceDescription* >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>> .getHandlerDescription("org.apache.felix.ipojo.properties");* >>>>>>>>>> * int state = instanceDescription.getState();* >>>>>>>>>> * System.out.println("State: " + state);* >>>>>>>>>> * if(ComponentInstance.VALID == >>> instanceDescription.getState()) >>>>> {* >>>>>>>>>> * PropertyDescription propDesc = >>>>>>>>>> configHandlerDescription.getPropertyByName("extenders"); // NPE* >>>>>>>>>> * if(propDesc != null) {* >>>>>>>>>> * String extenders = propDesc.getValue();* >>>>>>>>>> * System.out.println("Extenders: " + extenders);* >>>>>>>>>> * }* >>>>>>>>>> * else {* >>>>>>>>>> * System.out.println("Extenders is null");* >>>>>>>>>> * }* >>>>>>>>>> * }* >>>>>>>>>> * }* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I check the factory name to determine if this is a component that >>> I >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>> intercept. Presently I wait until the component is valid but I'm >>> not >>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>> if I can wait since my interceptor has to kick in before that. >>>>>>> Presently >>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>> get a null pointer exception when I try to retrieve my property. >>> Do >>>>> you >>>>>>>>>> have any idea why? It doesn't seem possible to retrieve >>> properties at >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> pont. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you try to inter ate over the set of properties and see what >>> are >>>>>>> they ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I also noticed that the method PropertyDescription.getValue() >>> always >>>>>>>>>> returns a String. In my case the underlying object is an array of >>>>>>> String >>>>>>>>>> (String[]). Is it possible to get the value in the correct type? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, there is a getObjectValue(BundleContext context) method, but >>> you >>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>> to give a bundle context object used if it needs to load classes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Clement >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> /Bengt >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/27 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 26 nov. 2013, at 16:00, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm getting a bit closer regarding the interceptors. Still two >>>>>>> problems >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> me: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) I still don't understand how to get hold of my intercepted >>>>>>> instance >>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>> within my interceptor. I get a reference to a DependencyModel >>> from >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>> can get a ComponentInstance. But how do I go from there to my >>>>>>>>> ComponentA >>>>>>>>>>>> class. I need to access the property "extenders" in order for my >>>>>>>>>>>> interceptor to do its job. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It depends how how is managed the extender property, let’s >>> imagine >>>>>>> it’s >>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>> @Property. In this case, from the Dependency Model, you can >>> retrieve >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> component instance. From the instance, you have access to the >>>>>>>>> introspection >>>>>>>>>>> layer (getInstanceDescription()), which let you analyze the iPOJO >>>>>>>>> container. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To be a bit more clear, let’s see some code: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> //First retrieve the configuration handler description from the >>>>>>> instance >>>>>>>>>>> container: >>>>>>>>>>> ConfigurationHandlerDescription description = >>>>>>>>>>> (ConfigurationHandlerDescription) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> model.getComponentInstance().getInstanceDescription().getHandlerDescription("org.apache.felix.ipojo.properties”); >>>>>>>>>>> // Find the extenders property >>>>>>>>>>> String extenders = >>>>>>>>> description.getPropertyByName("extenders").getValue(); >>>>>>>>>>> // You have your value ! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Also, when the property "extenders" is changed, I need to >>> force >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> interceptor to recalculate the dependencies. How can I >>> accomplish >>>>>>> that? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It also depends on how this reconfiguration happen. Let’s say >>> that >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> instance is reconfigured from the configuration admin or iPOJO >>>>>>>>>>> reconfiguration abilities. In these case being notified is quite >>>>>>>>> simple, as >>>>>>>>>>> you can register a ConfigurationListener on the >>>>>>>>>>> ConfigurationHandlerDescription object: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> description.addListener(new ConfigurationListener() { >>>>>>>>>>> public void configurationChanged(ComponentInstance >>>>> instance, >>>>>>>>>>> Map<String, Object> configuration) { >>>>>>>>>>> // The extender property may have been modified >>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>> }); >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Don’t forget to unregister the listener when the interceptor is >>>>>>>>> unplugged >>>>>>>>>>> from the instance. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Getting deeper into iPojo than I've been before… >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It’s just the beginning…. (contributions are welcome if you see >>> some >>>>>>>>>>> dark(er) area) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> /Bengt >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/26 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Clement! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/26 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 nov. 2013, at 20:19, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Clement and as always thanks for your detailed answer! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You’re welcome. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does seem a bit complicated to "require" an interceptor. >>>>>>> Perhaps >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easier way of doing this might be possible in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it would be a good addition. Thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I'm not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly sure that I understood what you meant. Just to >>> clarify: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My Component A (the component to be intercepted) has the >>>>> following >>>>>>>>>>> code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Property(name = "extenders", mandatory = false) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private String[] mExtenderIds; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Requires(optional = true, id = "extenders") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private IExtender[] mExtenders; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you mean that I should put a filter on the @Requires with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> id="extenders" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (the intercepted = true) so that it can only be satisfied if >>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has added that property? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how do I then handle the situation where my Component A >>> does >>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require any extenders? In that case I was planning on setting >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency to optional to make my instance valid without any >>>>>>>>>>> extenders. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or, perhaps I could first set the @Requires to mandatory >>> (with >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> filter): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Requires(optional = false, id = "extenders", >>>>>>>>>>>>>> filter="(intercepted=true)") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private IExtender[] mExtenders; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then, if my interceptor sees that the instance does not >>> require >>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extenders it can set the dependency to become optional. This >>>>> way I >>>>>>>>>>> both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require the interceptor (via the filter) and I ensure that >>> the >>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>> way >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allow the instance to be valid without the dependency is if >>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has explicitly set the dependency to optional. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would work. You can change the optionality status of the >>>>>>>>>>> dependency >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the dependency model you get in the interceptor. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clement >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Bengt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/25 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 nov. 2013, at 11:04, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected] >>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've started to investigate using iPojo interceptors. I'm >>>>> using >>>>>>>>>>> iPojo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 1.11.0. I want to accomplish the following: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Component A can be "extended" by specifying a list of >>>>> (required) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "extenders" (actually their id's), like this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Property(name = "extenders", mandatory = false) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private String[] mExtenderIds; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Requires(optional = true, id = "extenders") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private IExtender[] mExtenders; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The property is optional but if any extenderId's are listed >>>>> then >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Requires should require that IExtender's with the >>>>> corresponding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extenderId >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is started. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The IExtender interface contains the following method: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public String getExtenderId(); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thus, every extender has an extenderId and if that id is >>>>> listed >>>>>>>>> in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> components "extender" property then the corresponding >>> service >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required, otherwise not. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My idea (actually Clement's idea from a previous >>> conversation >>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list). is to use a RankingInterceptor that returns an empty >>>>>>> array >>>>>>>>>>>>>> until >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required services are present. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is doable but in order for my >>> RankingInterceptor >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must have access to the component's "extenders" property. >>> It >>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through all the services implementing the IExtender >>> interface >>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are extenders corresponding to the required extenderId's it >>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> return >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all of those, otherwise it would return an empty list. >>> Also, >>>>> if >>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extenderId's was specified, then the service dependency is >>> set >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mandatory, otherwise to optional. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My problem is how to gain access to the configuration >>> property >>>>>>>>> (the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "extenders" property) of my component from the interceptor. >>>>> How >>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When the interceptor is hooked to a dependency, it receives >>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> model object. From this object you can retrieve the >>> component >>>>>>>>>>> instance >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the introspection metadata. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another question I have is how to make sure that the >>>>> interceptor >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> active. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the interceptor is not active then my component could >>>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erroneously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid. Would it be feasible to have a mandatory dependency >>> on >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptor? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately not, at least not easily. What you can do is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> combination >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between a filter and two interceptors: the ranking >>> interceptors >>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> did, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a tracking interceptor. Let me explain: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let’s imagine your consumer with your service dependency. >>> Add a >>>>>>>>>>> filter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that will be resolved only if your interceptor is there, >>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>>>>> like: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (intercepted=true). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your interceptor implement both tracking and ranking >>>>>>> interceptors. >>>>>>>>>>> When >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the accept method is called on your interceptor, it can >>>>>>>>> ‘transform’ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original service reference to add the ‘intercepted’ property >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ref.addProperty(“intercepted”, true);) This modified >>> service >>>>>>>>>>> reference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches your filter. Then, do your ranking policy are we >>>>>>> discussed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This solution ensure that your dependency can only be >>> resolved >>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptor is there. Indeed without the interceptor, the >>>>> filter >>>>>>>>> does >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> match. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Bengt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
