> I found Ubuntu Brainstorm very dis-satisfying. The main problem with it > (imo) > is that the first few pages are all old ideas that have received a lot of > votes. >
> If the first page had the most easily viable ideas along with the most > innovative and interesting ideas then it would work a lot better. The > problem > is how could that be automated?? > That is quite simple. If the ideas are outdated they should simply be dismissed by the devs as Outdated :) The voting process is the most democratic (anyone can suggest an idea) and the most meritocratic (the best ideas climb to the top independently of who suggested them) Of course this "forces" the devs to take a look at the list, say once a month, discuss the top 10 items and classify them as Planned, Outdated, Portponed, Rejected, etc (this is a mix of options available in Dropbox and Sourceforge) As soon as an idea is classified as Completed it is archived and the next most voted idea will rise to the top 10 "automagically" ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Idea-about-Ideas-tp2117657p2125442.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
