Le 10/03/2017 à 09:44, Fiorenza Meini a écrit : Hi Fiorenza,
> The only difference we can see, is that if I give the command "type > libreoffice5.2 on the working account, I see "hashing done on > libreoffice5.2 (/usr/bin/libreoffice5.2)". > If I give the same commando the NON WORKING account, I see: > libreoffice5.2 is /usr/bin/libreoffice5.2. > > The behaviour isn't the same ! > What does mean "hashing done" ? Perhaps is this the problem ? At a guess, the DEB package that points to /usr/bin/libreOffice5.2 is hashed for installation security reasons (part of the signing of the packages) and this hash is verified when a user attempts to execute a program from that link. In the non-functional user accounts, the hash isn't verified, so the application isn't executed (I'm just speculating here, don't take my word as gospel). This kind of rings a bell as a Ubuntu bug I read about a while ago where some user accounts when created did not have an appropiate set up of executable links to libreoffice - some kind of problem with /etc/skel not copying everything or setting correct permissions for the newly created user. Perhaps you might find something by searching in the Ubuntu launchpad bug database ? Alex -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
