> > It seems to me If there is no such LB/VIP that stops new connections > > from landing on this server, the new option should be avoided. > > Correct. > > > But if there is such a LB/VIP, the option is not really needed. Is it fair? > > The patch helps in this case because we no longer close the listening > sockets unconditionally, I mean without first checking if there are > new connections in the backlog. So I thought the option was needed > because if nothing stops new connections from arriving it could > prevent the child from stopping indefinitely? How could we know if a > LB/VIP is in place?
I mean the initial patch vs. the status quo, not just the opt-in part. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
