Bill Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > THe last time it was seriously raised was at the Joint IETF/ISOC mtg in > Montreal. The failure modes are pretty spectactular, at least until > DNSsec is deployed and applications can verify the accuracy of the data > received from a root server. You can probably manage to forge data in a significant way right now -- I'm not sure host routes in the DFZ would make that substantially worse. It is also possible to use standard policy mechanisms to note attempts to hijack one of the routes... .pm --------------------------------------------------------------------- The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Robert Elz
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Christian Huitema
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Antonio Querubin
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns itojun
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Marc Blanchet
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Jim . Bound
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Cricket Liu
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Matt Crawford