As an immediate solution you could also use tabs, for example "Simple search" containing the most used field and "Advanced Search" containing all. Or have the results on a dedicated tab.
On 14 April 2017 at 14:18, Martin Hesse <mwhe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On a side note: I was looking at how to hide an empty heading of a property > group panel the other day (no name set, no actions in heading). I was > unsure whether or how I should contribute that, but I found that in certain > cases a fieldset didn't need a name and an empty heading just looked a bit > strange. Let me know if you would want to create an issue for this first, > if you're interested. > I didn't try to hide it with css though, only thought about this > afterwards. So unsure whether that should be a feature or not. Any comments > welcome. > From what I recall when looking at the markup it didn't look like the > heading itself was easily selectable. > ... > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Martin Hesse <mwhe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Great idea! Should we then also add a property "displayViewSelector" to > > control whether the dropdown is to be shown on the fieldset? Otherwise it > > could congest the overall presentation of the UI a bit if the layout > > contains a lot of fieldsets. In case the "displayViewSelector" expression > > is false the view should then be "open" and the "defaultView" property > > ignored. This could also be an improvement of the table layout/component, > > for cases where the view selector is not needed there either. WDYT? > > > > Martin > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Dan Haywood < > d...@haywood-associates.co.uk > > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Hector, > >> > >> Thanks for uploading that image ... a picture tells a thousand words. > >> > >> To implement your requirements, I could imagine the <fieldset> element > >> having an additional attribute, say "defaultView" (similar to the > >> <collection> element / @CollectionLayout annotation), which might > default > >> to "open" but also support "hide". This corresponds to > >> the org.apache.isis.applib.layout.component.FieldSet class. > >> > >> In the UI, this corresponds to the org.apache.isis.viewer.wic > >> ket.ui.components.entity.fieldset.PropertyGroup class, which is passed > >> the FieldSet into its constructor (by way of its Wicket model). So it > >> looks like this PropertyGroup component could quite easily be made a > little > >> more sophisticated to have a drop-down. > >> > >> Do you fancy delving in to see if you can get a spike working (with a > >> view to incorporating this functionality into a future version of the > >> framework)? Martin Grigorov is our Wicket expert, and he is usually > very > >> prompt at answering any Wicket-specific questions. > >> > >> HTH > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 at 23:26 Hector Fabio Meza < > >> hector.m...@smartools.com.co> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks for your quick response, Dan. > >>> > >>> What I already have is this: http://picpaste.com/pics/Captu > >>> ra-3YyASQhp.1491690059.JPG > >>> > >>> It's a ViewModel with a table that can contain a lot of rows, and a > >>> group of fields that act as filters for the table. The fields can > sometimes > >>> use up a lot of the screen, so I was wondering if the same component > that > >>> allows to hide the table could be used to make the zone highlighted in > blue > >>> collapsible, in order to show it only when the user wants to use it. > >>> > >>> I also found this, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1031, > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1031%20>which could be an > >>> alternative, but replacing the table component sounds more difficult > than > >>> using a hide button. > >>> > >>> > >>> El 2017-04-08 10:39, Dan Haywood escribió: > >>> > >>> Could you do a sketch of the sort of User interface that you are after? > >>> > >>> On Sat, 8 Apr 2017, 16:31 Hector Fabio Meza, < > >>> hector.m...@smartools.com.co> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I have a ViewModel that includes a set of fields and a table. The > table > >>>> has the default button that allows to change the view and hide the > table, > >>>> but I have the requirement of replicating this behavior for the set of > >>>> fields. > >>>> > >>>> Is this possible? I imagine I'll have to delve into the WicketViewer > >>>> classes, are there any hints or tips for this? > >>>> > >>>> Thank you. > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> *Hector Fabio Meza* > >>>> *R&D Lead smartools* > >>>> (57) 300 2254455 <%2857%29%20300%206815404> > >>>> Skype: hectorf.meza > >>>> www.smartools.com.co > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> *Hector Fabio Meza* > >>> *R&D Lead smartools* > >>> (57) 300 2254455 <%2857%29%20300%206815404> > >>> Skype: hectorf.meza > >>> www.smartools.com.co > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
