Hi,
On 3/1/07, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jukka Zitting schrieb:
> There is a slow ongoing debate about how to best handle such names,
> and whether there should be some standard escaping mechanism. My best
> advice would be to use a string property if you want to avoid any
> restrictions on illegal characters.
Nit: but even with a string property there some characters will be
illegal, right? Or wasn't that the agreed-upon answer on what to do with
string properties that contain characters not allowed in XML (1.0)
content (such as most control characters)?
No, the illegal XML characters only cause trouble with the XML import
and export features (see JCR-674). There should be no restrictions
when string properties are accessed using the normal JCR API methods -
anything you can express in UTF-16 (as used by Java) should be OK with
Jackrabbit.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
