> > jcr:contains can handle lucene syntax, so also the wildcard
to be sure : lucene syntax, so a wildcard is * and not % > query you are suggesting. But, at [1] you can already see > that a wildcard prefix will be very expensive (though depends > on the number of different values you have for a property). > For jcr:like a prefix query a even *much* more expensive than > for jcr:contains. > > I am though quite sure you can solve the thing you want to > achieve differently. What is the usecase? > > -Ard > > [1] > http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/ > javadoc/or > g/apache/lucene/search/WildcardQuery.html > > ps the link seems to be down at the moment of this writing > > > Juan > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/does-jcr%3Alike-has-a-wildcard-like-jcr% > > 3Acontain--tp15143136p15144614.html > > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > >
