RE: SMPP 3.4 Optional Fields

[Oded Arbel]

Indeed SMPPv3.4 can use message_payload, and if you are using that version, they can sure avoid using message_text. Have you tried setting the interface-version configuration parameter to 33 ?   -- Oded Arbel m-Wise mobile solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED]   +972-9-9581711 (116) +972-67-340014   ::.. Math is like love -- a simple idea but it can get complicated.   -----Original Message----- From: Troy Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:03 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: SMPP 3.4 Optional Fields Hi,   I was curious to see if any body has developed a way to handle the ‘optional’ SMPP 3.4 fields (such as message_payload).  Our carrier is insistent that SMPP 3.4 does not use the message_text field – but only the message_payload field.   We had developed a hack previously that is now failing as it assumed there would only ever be one optional field delivered; now our carrier occasionally delivers other optional fields.   It is no fun arguing with a large telco!   Regards, Troy Kelly   http://www.webcentral.com/ AU: 1800-800-099 NZ: 0800-440-077 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]