Hi, Refering to this thread:
http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/devel/2006-December/000688.html In earlier version this problem was present, according to Stipe, it was solved after the new releases. Is there a relationship with the intervals of enquiry links or high load sms traffic? Regards Elton On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Falko Ziemann <fal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > maybe a problem with the enquire link interval? So that the enquire_link > comes, when the smsc already run into a timeout? > > Regards > Falko > > Am 22.06.2009 um 08:55 schrieb Elton Hoxha: > > > Hi guys, >> >> From the application (the application that listens and sends through >> kannel) I noticed some "queued for later delivery" logs. I checked the >> kannel logs for the respective time that happened. The connection is >> re-established but do you have any idea what is the reason of System Error >> 104? >> >> Thanks >> >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[credit-141]: Sending enquire >> link: >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb2200708 dump: >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] DEBUG: command_id: 21 = 0x00000015 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x00000000 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] DEBUG: sequence_number: 18694 = >> 0x00004906 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] ERROR: Error reading from fd 25: >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset >> by peer >> 2009-06-21 18:14:09 [5781] [6] ERROR: SMPP[credit-141]: Couldn't connect >> to SMS center (retrying in 10 seconds). >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [8] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [8] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to box: >> <10.1.2.202> >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: clear_old_concat_parts called >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message >> (0x98610f8 vs 0x98610f8) >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: Routing failed, re-queued. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message >> (0x98610f8 vs 0x98610f8) >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: Routing failed, re-queued. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: time to sleep 30.00 >> secs. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: gwlist_len = 1 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message >> (0x98610f8 vs 0x98610f8) >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: Routing failed, re-queued. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message >> (0x98610f8 vs 0x98610f8) >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: Routing failed, re-queued. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:12 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: time to sleep 30.00 >> secs. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:15 [5781] [8] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received >> 2009-06-21 18:14:15 [5781] [8] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to box: >> <10.1.2.202> >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [8] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [8] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to box: >> <10.1.2.202> >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[credit-141]: Sending PDU: >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb2200590 dump: >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: type_name: bind_transceiver >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: command_id: 9 = 0x00000009 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x00000000 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: sequence_number: 18695 = >> 0x00004907 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: system_id: "xxx" >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: password: "xxx" >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: system_type: "xxx" >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: interface_version: 52 = 0x00000034 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: addr_ton: 0 = 0x00000000 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: addr_npi: 0 = 0x00000000 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: address_range: "141" >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: Optional parameter tag (0x0210) >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: Optional parameter length read as 1 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[credit-141]: Got PDU: >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb2200590 dump: >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: type_name: bind_transceiver_resp >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483657 = >> 0x80000009 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x00000000 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: sequence_number: 18695 = >> 0x00004907 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: system_id: NULL >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: sc_interface_version: 52 = >> 0x00000034 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: gwlist_len = 3 >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message >> (0x98610f8 vs 0x98610f8) >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [7] DEBUG: Message routed successfully. >> 2009-06-21 18:14:19 [5781] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message >> (0x9860918 vs 0x9860918) >> >> >