Hi,

If it happens it doesn't go through dlr_add or dlr_find. Do you know which part of the code generates a "fake" DLR out of a NACK'd submit_sm_resp? This happens also with SMPPbox (NACK'd submit_sm_resp instead of DLR 016).

Thanks,
Nikos

----- Original Message ----- From: <alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> To: "Arne K. Haaje" <a...@drlinux.no>; "us...@kannel. us...@kannel. Org" <users@kannel.org>
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)


This works fine on latest cvs for sure. Dlr-mask 24 should give you ack and nack, and also extra meta-data (error code, message I'd, etc).

Regards,

Alex
BlackBerry de movistar, allν donde estιs estα tu oficin@

-----Original Message-----
From: "Arne K. Haaje" <a...@drlinux.no>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:40:16
To: <users@kannel.org>
Cc: Kyriacos Sakkas<kyria...@netsmart.com.cy>; Alejandro Guerrieri<alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)

I've had the same experience, and there is a dirty work around for this;

It should work setting dlr-mask=24 to give you a call to your url for rejected
and acked, but it does not seem to work.

However, if you set dlr-mask=31 a dlr will get created, and your url will be
called for both status 8 and 16.

Keep in mind though that as a final 1 or 2 will never get sent from yoru
operator, you will need to flush out your delivery reports now and then.

Fredag 04 desember 2009 15:08:12 skrev Kyriacos Sakkas :
Hmm, I am using an oldish version, need to check if meta-data is there...

Still the DLR returns nothing, not doubting you but at least on the
version I am running a DLR record does not even get created when its
NACked, so that something can be returned.


Kyriacos

Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
> Enabling dlr-mask and dlr-url will get you the NACK message as a DLR.
> If you're using latest CVS you'll get some extra values as meta-data
> as well.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kyriacos Sakkas
> <kyria...@netsmart.com.cy <mailto:kyria...@netsmart.com.cy>> wrote:
>
>     Firstly apologies to all if this is documented somewhere already,
>     please
>     point me there.
>
>     I have a connection (SMPP3.4) where the operator decided not to
>     use DLRs
>     but reject submit_sm on Premium MT messages when an MSISDN does
>     not have
>     enough credit to receive.
>
> I need to pass this information to my application. Up to know, and > on
>     other connections, I would recieve on a similar situation a DLR 8
> from kannel and then a 2/16 from the operator.
>
>     Since this messages are now NACKed, nothing is returned. Other than
>     treating messages with no DLR status after X minutes as failed, is
>     there
>     any way to pass this response out of kannel?
>     Can this be made to include some message ID?
>
>     Sample:
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG: SMPP[conID]: Sending PDU:
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb49152b8 dump:
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
> 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = > 0x00000004
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =
>     0x00000000
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 111 =
>     0x0000006f
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 3 =
>     0x00000003
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 9 =
>     0x00000009
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   source_addr: "xxxx"
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 =
>     0x00000001
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 =
>     0x00000001
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   destination_addr:
> "xxxxxxxx" 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   esm_class: 3 =
> 0x00000003 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 =
> 0x00000000 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 =
> 0x00000000
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time:
> NULL 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
> 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 1 =
> 0x00000001
> 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG: replace_if_present_flag: > 0
> = 0x00000000
> 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG: data_coding: 0 = > 0x00000000
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 =
>     0x00000000
> 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG: sm_length: 32 = > 0x00000020
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   short_message:
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:    Octet string at
> 0xb49156c0: 2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:      len:  32
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:      size: 36
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:      immutable: 0
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:      data: 54 45 18 54 20
>     41 16
>     4f 3a 20 35 34 36 30 30 20   TE.T A.O: xxxxx
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:      data: 18 54 4f 20 33
>     30 36
>     39 34 34 39 35 35 37 32 39   .TO xxxxxxxxxx
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG:    Octet string dump ends.
>     2009-12-03 12:53:45 [31692] [23] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated
>     string (message_id) has no NULL.
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] DEBUG: SMPP[conID]: Got PDU:
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb49152b8 dump:
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm_resp
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483652 =
>     0x80000004
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   command_status: 8 =
>     0x00000008
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 111 =
>     0x0000006f
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] DEBUG:   message_id: NULL
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>     2009-12-03 12:53:46 [31692] [23] ERROR: SMPP[conID]: SMSC returned
>     error
>     code 0x00000008 (System Error) in response to submit_sm.
>
>
>     thanks to all in advance,
>
>     Kyriacos
>
>
>     --
>     Kyriacos Sakkas
>     Development Team
>     Netsmart
>     Tel: + 357 22 452565
>     Fax: + 357 22 452566
>     Email: kyria...@netsmart.com.cy <mailto:kyria...@netsmart.com.cy>
>     http://www.netsmart.com.cy
>
>     Taking Business to a New Level!
>
>     ** Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email
>     message may be privileged, confidential and protected from
> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination,
>     distribution,
>     or copying of this  email message is strictly prohibited.
>     If you think that you have received this email message in error,
>     please
>     email the sender at kyria...@netsmart.com.cy
>     <mailto:kyria...@netsmart.com.cy> **


--
--------------------------------
Arne K. Haaje | www.drx.no
T: 69 51 15 52 | M: 92 88 44 66
--------------------------------



Reply via email to