On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 11:39, Rudy Matela wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Joan <aseq...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It took quite a lot of time to find out that the version 1.4.3 doesn't > > support a quite typical format for the DLR timestamps, so I'll document it > > here for the other people that might be affected. > > kannel 1.4.3 supports without issues the format defined in the SMPP > > specification 3.4 for DLR timestamps (YYMMDDhhmm) (Appendix B), but it's > > common now to find providers using a format with seconds (YYMMDDhhmmss). > > Kannel 1.4.3 won't be able to read that timestamp and will mark all the > > replies as if there was a malformed response. > > > > There is a patch in kannel source tree to change this, but probably involves > > more changes to work (simply applying the patch doesn't work) > > https://redmine.kannel.org/projects/kannel/repository/revisions/4749/diff/trunk/gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c > > > > So the people using debian should be aware of this, a working .deb with 1.5 > > can be found here -> https://redmine.kannel.org/projects/kannel/files > > Nice to know that. Has anyone tried that .deb package on Ubuntu > Server? Does it work on it out-of-the-box?
Yes. Some people reported to me that it works quite fine on Debian and Ubuntu. No one reported any problem to me, yet. And it works for me without any problem for more than a year. These days I'm trying to move from Debian dh_make to cdbs build method. I've built all packages except docs by cdbs. (I have to learn more about cdbs.) > There is also an Arch Linux PKGBUILD on AUR for version 1.5.0: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kannel/ > > > By the way, since 1.5.0 has been pretty stable for at least one year > > (according to the mailing list), are there any plans to retag the 1.5 as the > > current stable? > > A little contribution on the topic: > > I've been using the 1.5.0 on my developemnt machine for about a year, > so far I did not run into any problems related to that version. In > fact, it seemed more stable than the 1.4.3 version, which keeps giving > me: > > 2013-01-21 11:24:26 [1234] [6] ERROR: AT2[mycenter]: CMS ERROR: +CMS ERROR: > 321 > 2013-01-21 11:24:26 [1234] [6] ERROR: AT2[mycenter]: CMS ERROR: > Invalid memory index -> don't worry, just memory fragmentation. (321) > > That does not really cause malfunction, just mess up the log file a little. > > The AUR PKGBUILD has 13 votes (which on Arch Linux community indicates > some kind of stability aprooval, > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kannel/). So a lot people have been > using and testing it for a while as just a percentage of people who > actually use the package actually take time to vote. > > Regards, > Rudy > -- Kind regards, Milan -------------------------------------------------- Arvanta, http://www.arvanta.net Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code or documents in proprietary format (word, excel, pps and so on)
