That is what I thought. Thank you for confirmation.
> On 21 Nov 2017, at 10:49, amal...@kannel.org wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> there is submit_sm_resp for each submit_sm for concatenated message as well.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex
> 
> 
>> Am 21.11.2017 um 08:23 schrieb Grant Saicom <grant.sai...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:grant.sai...@gmail.com>>:
>> 
>> Hello Kannel Users
>> 
>> I have a question with regards to the signaling flow of a concatenated SMS. 
>> 
>> Simplistically, when we send a single (successful) sms of less than 160 
>> chars (gsm7) on an established bind, the ESME sends a single submit_sm to 
>> the SMSC, then the SMSC responds to the ESME with a submit_sm_resp for that 
>> message. According to a document I found at 
>> docs.nimta.com/SMPP_v3_4_Issue1_2.pdf 
>> <http://docs.nimta.com/SMPP_v3_4_Issue1_2.pdf>, it says that for each 
>> submit_sm, there should be a submit_sm_resp (pages 21 - 22).
>> 
>> What does the message flow look like when a message of more than 160 
>> characters (concatenated message) is sent using GSM SMS User Data and UDH?
>> 
>> Is there a submit_sm_resp for each submit_sm or a single submit_sm_resp for 
>> the several submit_sm of the concatenated message?
>> 
>> Kind regards
>> Grant
>> 
> 

Reply via email to