On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:31:06PM +0100, Christoph Kutzinski wrote:
> Why do you want to do this? Why not just fix the compile errors?

Likely the same reason that compiler writers have spent so much time
studying error recovery in parsers: to discover as many errors as
possible in one iteration.  Fewer iterations, each one more
productive.

You also get a better feel for just how buggy the code is, and for
patterns of problems, by seeing everything that *doesn't* fail to
compile.  It's useful to be able to answer questions like, "this is
happening all over the place -- is there a deeper problem?"

Of course that has to be balanced against the fact that, when
compiling X against broken Y, you may not get a true picture of the
status of X.

-- 
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer   mw...@iupui.edu
Friends don't let friends publish revisable-form documents.

Attachment: pgpCFXpy2ucDp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to