Hi Barrie,

> Whether its Jenkins, or a developer, you've still pushed a release
> that could break the build.
>
> This is where you need some isolation available to your workflow.

Agreed!

However, for Fay's stated requirement, it may be sufficient to have a
broken master branch as long as the latest deployed SNAPSHOT is not broken,
since he stated:

> Currently my pain is our developer would deploy broken bytecode to our
> dev repository and broken others work.

Regards,
Curtis

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Barrie Treloar <baerr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30 October 2014 08:38, Curtis Rueden <ctrue...@wisc.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi Fay,
> >
> > > Could i define a intermediate repository, everytime they deploy,
> > > jenkins will verify it.
> >
> > Why not have Jenkins do your deploys? I.e.: make it so that only Jenkins
> > has deploy permission to your remote repository. So your devs can no
> longer
> > run "mvn deploy" from the CLI and expect it to work, but instead just
> push
> > to master (or whatever integration branch) and then Jenkins runs the
> build.
> >
> > Once Jenkins does your deploys, you can set up your jobs to test for more
> > stringent conditions before actually doing the deploy. E.g.:
> >
> > $ git clean -fdx
> > $ mvn clean install
> > $ bin/verify-artifacts.sh
> > $ mvn deploy
> >
> > And "verify-artifacts.sh" does whatever further programmatic testing you
> > need.
> >
> > OTOH, in many cases, you don't need a shell script -- often times, you
> can
> > get what you need using Maven plugins like Surefire, Failsafe, and
> > Enforcer. If you go that route, it might be enough so that devs running
> > "mvn deploy" won't deploy bad stuff to the repo by default (unless they
> are
> > aggressive enough to run e.g. "mvn -DskipTests deploy" which would be
> > pretty bold).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Curtis
>
>
> Whether its Jenkins, or a developer, you've still pushed a release that
> could break the build.
>
> This is where you need some isolation available to your workflow.
>
> Stuff breaks - it happens, Fay needs to determine how they want to deal
> with it.
>

Reply via email to