I don't believe so, since it assumes it to be provided.
If you use "compile" instead of "provided", does it work? It is not
expected to be transitive, however.
- Brett
2008/9/25 William Vuong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have something like this in my ant file and the maven ant tasks 2.0.9 and
> ant 1.7 that loads a pom.xml file and creates a bunch of filesets:
>
>
>
> <target name="wtf">
>
> <!-- declare pom.xml -->
>
> <artifact:pom id="maven.project" file="pom.xml" />
>
>
>
> <!-- provided.fileset -->
>
> <artifact:dependencies pomRefId="maven.project"
> pathId="provided.classpath" filesetId="provided.fileset"
> verbose="${maven.verbosity}" useScope="provided" />
>
>
>
> <!-- make a copy of it -->
>
> <mkdir dir="provided-scope"/>
>
> <copy todir="provided-scope" flatten="true">
>
> <fileset refid="provided.fileset"/>
>
> </copy>
>
> </target>
>
>
>
> And my pom file does have several dependencies with the provided scope:
>
>
>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.oracle</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>ojdbc14</artifactId>
>
> <version>9.0.2.0.0</version>
>
> <scope>provided</scope>
>
> </dependency>
>
>
>
> So when I execute "ant wtf", none of the dependencies in the provided scope
> gets copied into that directory. The provided scope is supported by the
> maven ant tasks, right? Or am I doing something wrong?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
--
Brett Porter
Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
