You could write a plugin... it's not that hard 2009/3/4 stanlick <stanl...@gmail.com>
> > I hear you pal, but the lawyers are concentrating on the fact that the > archives are on our machine following a download of the full zip. So do > you > think Maven might be able to report on them for the lawyers even though > they > are not "dependencies?" > > Peace, > Scott > > > > Stephen Connolly-2 wrote: > > > > Those dependencies are required to *test* struts.... they are not > required > > by your project as struts has already been tested. > > > > -Stephen > > > > 2009/3/3 stanlick <stanl...@gmail.com> > > > >> > >> Thanks guys -- > >> > >> If you look at the POM for Struts 2.1.6 there are many more dependencies > >> than what show up running > >> dependency:resolve. I verifies the default for scope because several of > >> the > >> dependencies are "test." It appears the default is all scopes, so I am > >> wondering why I don't see them all when I run dependency:resolve. > >> > >> Peace, > >> Scott > >> - Show quoted text - > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Dependency-question-tp22315314p22328900.html > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >
