Thank you for coming back to me. Please do that on your own time.
I just want to clear it out, but not an urgent cast. Take it easy please! 2017-01-19 17:10 GMT+08:00 Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>: > Sorry, still stuck with day job :/ Will try to squeeze one hour out of > my busy schedule to review your explaination. > > > I also have to do a small experiment to reproduce the issue. > > > Thanks for your patience ! > > > Le 17/01/2017 à 05:32, Xu Congyuan a écrit : > > Dear all, Hope you are doing well. > > > > Please kindly advise if the problem I found is on processing. Any > > informations , please feel free to let me know. > > > > > > > > 2017-01-13 9:12 GMT+08:00 Xu Congyuan <xcongy...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Thanks for reply. Sorry for not clear it. > >> Basically, we will get the number of idleWorkers 0 or more than 0, > >> if idleWorkers = 0, that's meaning no work is idle, we should add > workers > >> if it's necessary; > >> if idleWorkers > 0 , that's meaning there are idle works, no necessary > to > >> add workers. > >> Do I get the point? > >> Let's back to the original, while the MINA starting. At this time, the > >> num of idleWorker == 0, therefor we call addWorkerIfNecessary() method > when > >> task is coming, because of idleWorker == 0, we do addWorker and > increase > >> the num of idle at line 259 (version 2.0.16). so idleWorker == 1 at this > >> time, the first worker be fired and start running, we enter the infinite > >> loop, and decrease the num of idleWorker to 0 at line 686(version > 2.0.16), > >> basically that's we expected, but there is exception throw by > runTasks(), > >> the finally code is executed at line 707, and increase the idleWorker > to 1 > >> again, the infinite 'for' loop drop out because we don't catch the > >> exception, the outer try...finally code executed at line 712 removed the > >> worker. > >> Let's sort out ideas, by now, the idleWorker == 1 and there is no > worker > >> is running, is right? so the mina fall into fake dead. > >> > >> Please let me know I did the right investigation. > >> > >> > >> 2017-01-13 0:11 GMT+08:00 Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>: > >> > >>> Hi ! > >>> > >>> > >>> sorry for the delayed response, was busy... > >>> > >>> > >>> I'm not sure I understand : if you get an exception in the runTasks() > >>> call, the 'finally' code is executed, and the number of idle worker is > >>> incremented, no matter what... > >>> > >>> > >>> Can you check that ? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Emmanuel Lecharny > >>> > >>> Symas.com > >>> directory.apache.org > >>> > >>> > > -- > Emmanuel Lecharny > > Symas.com > directory.apache.org > >
