> I thought: why not putting this file <facelets defn file for tomahawk> > right away in the meta-inf of the Tomahawk jar? > Won't harm nobody but will certainly help a lot of people. > Although I still subscribe to that idea, he had a point also: > MF and facelets are indeed 2 different technologies, better keep the 2 apart.
Oh, come on, I've heard lame excuses before but this would seem to take the cake. It's not like facelets support requires additional code/classes/whatever to use tomahawk and facelets, it is merely the extra xml file. Now the end users are forced to try to track down a working file that has a version that works with the version of tomahawk they're using. Give 'em a break and just add the file and be done with it...
