On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is good to know how a user expect to use this feature, so I'll keep in > mind it the suggestions.
While I didn't previously have any need for stateless JSF, I might need it in the future. I've been asked to consider converting a struts/velocity web app I wrote many years ago to JSF. Conversion of velocity struts to facelets is straight-forward. However, struts is stateless, and attempting to convert a struts application to stateful JSF would be painful, as every struts request/response is independent of the next one. I'm kind of hoping that stateless JSF might work out better.
