I think there was something with the binaries I published. Had to clean out all the old snapshots and redeploy to a clean repo before I could get the updates to come down.

Try it again. (clean out the openejb section of your repo for good measure).

-David


On Jun 27, 2008, at 8:45 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:


No, does not work. See the attached sample project.

In the API is the annotated ServiceAddressException class. But the unit tests fails.

Regards,
Karsten


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: David Blevins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Juni 2008 07:32
An: users@openejb.apache.org
Betreff: Re: @ApplicationException(rollback=true) ignored
from external API


On Jun 25, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Karsten Ohme wrote:

David Blevins schrieb:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 9:38 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I run a test which provokes an application exception. The
exception
is defined in the same module and annotated with
@ApplicationException(rollback=true). The Exception is
rolled back.
Fine.

Another test checks also an exception. The exception is
not from an
EJB module, but from an imported API. The exception has the same
annotation, but the transaction is not rolled back. It
seams to me
that the annotation in this class is ignored.
We definitely don't check the annotations at runtime,
simply because
you can override them via the deployment descriptor so the
"merged"
set of meta data is the only safe thing to execute against
at runtime
(not if we expect to pass the tck anyway ;).  But as you
point out we
just check the module itself for @ApplicationException annotated
classes.

I don't have them annotated in the deployment descriptor.
This would
be very uncomfortable, because each module which uses the exception
from the other module would have to do this.

Agree, that would be an unnecessary pain.

Hmm...
Is the annotated exception class listed in any of the
throws clauses
of the business interface methods in module B?

Yes, it is.

(where module A has the exception class, module B does
not) If so, we
could expand our support to looking there too in addition
to scraping
the module jar.

Would be nice.

Ok. Implemented that technique.  Should you decide to
override the app exception in the deployment descriptor of
module B, for example, that will work too.

New 3.1-SNAPSHOT binaries have been published.  Give it a try
and let us know if it works out.

-David


<applicationexceptiontest.zip>

Reply via email to