On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 17:12:19 +0700 "Urmas" <davian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Rob Weir": > In what way do you think this is true? > > Bugs/features affecting Windows integration or performance are overlooked, > sometimes for 2–3 years. Compatibility and interaction with Windows-only > software is ridiculed. > > Those ones affecting Linux get more attention. It gives a clear message that > developers give no crap about users and are concerned only with their > corporations' interests. > > My pet peeve is the terrible work with dictionaries in Windows version which > makes me use a Linux VM just to proofread documents. > So you'd rather whine about some kind of 'problem' (that you don't give an example of btw, and which you simply could have written to this list about...2-3 years ago...to ask about it or let the dev's know about it) and pet peeves of a *FREE* software suite instead of going and using/buying the similar app (which has hundreds of people *getting paid* to work on) built purely for that nasty Windows OS? You wouldn't happen to be sitting in a park, using someone elses wireless connection to get online, defecating anywhere you please along with a hundred other people who haven't bathed in a couple weeks instead of being at work like the rest of us and are holding signs complaining about those who worked hard to have the money and company(ies) they own, would you? There's no pleasing the ungrateful. -- “Those who suppress freedom always do so in the name of law and order.” -John v. Lindsey
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
