> > Hm. Your experience differs from mine. I tried using bayes, spent > hundreds of hours training bayes with lots of good mail from > archives, and lots of bad mail, and never got better than .5% (point- > five or .005) difference in spam detection. So we stopped using it. > > In comparison, we've jacked the AWL score range and this works great > for us. > > -- > Jo Rhett
I shouldn't have been so flippant about AWL. What I was trying to do was say that AWL without a good plan of mgmt can work against you.... much like anything I spose. I didn't even know how AWL worked or that it was working when I did my first SA install. Ooopps. :-) Can you please specifically describe what you mean by jacked? Or better yet, is there a specific howto so to speak for this approach of yours please?? :-) Thank you Jo. - rh -- Robert - Abba Communications Computer & Internet Services (509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net
