> Your question doesn't really make sense. The results of the Bayes > examination > are rules based on the 0-100 spam probability. > > If I understand what you're asking though, the Bayes system results in > 1 rule > hit, whereas there are hundreds of other rules that can all hit, so > generally > rules would outweigh Bayes, unless you change the weighting (score) of > the > Bayes rule in relation to the other rules. >
Thanks for helping. I didn´t understand until now. All make sense. I'm trying to use SpamAssassin in a structure as such: Postfix + Amavis + Clamav + SpamAssassin. Will I lose much considerably in the quality of my anti-spam if I not use the bayesian rule? Best Regards, -- []'s Thiago Henrique Network Administration Digirati Networks K8 Networks Hostnet Hosting
