On 06.12.09 11:39, Marc Perkel wrote: > I'm wondering if the language detection in TextCat can be improved. > Here's the situation. > > It appears that TextCat was designed to be inclusive. You list the > languages you want and it returns many possibilities so as not to > trigger unwanted falsely. > > What I'm doing is extracting the language list for Exim where I hope to > offer a language reject list. The problem is that when you are rejecting > languages you want a smaller list that when you are including languages > to avoid false positives. I'd rather have a single (non-english) result. > > I'm wondering if there's a way to add some more options to alter the > behavior of the plugin so it is more optimized towards the idea of > rejecting languages?
What's the point? Why do you think that would an improvement? I think that most of people speak a few languages while there are dozens of languages they do not speak. Why do you think people would want all but a few languages? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. REALITY.SYS corrupted. Press any key to reboot Universe.
