On 2015-05-03 5:34, Nick Edwards wrote:
Is there any reason
reason="invalid (public key: not available)" is declared as "error"
to fail t_dkim_invalid
1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
This is published a neutral so should not be considered invalid
This only occurs since upgrade 3.4.0 - 3.4.1, no changed made by the
sender - its a govt dept, who doesnt change things at all let alone in
middle of weekend.
Be a shame to have to score that 0 simply because the code over reacts.
The score for this rule should be a zero or a near-zero.
There must be some problem with assigning a score to
such test rule (the 1.0 is a default value if a score line
is missing).
An invalid or unverifiable DKIM signature is supposed to be
treated equivalent to a missing signature.
Mark
