Pid wrote:
On 28/11/2009 12:56, André Warnier wrote:
;-)
I just wanted, once, to use a subject line with capitals and an
exclamation mark.
It seems however that in this particular case, neither Tomcat nor Apache
httpd follow the rules, when they default to the .. default virtual host
in the case where they cannot find a match between the Host: header and
one of their defined virtual hosts.
Doesn't the following say that they MUST return a 400 status ?
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec5.html#sec5.2
"An origin server that does not allow resources to differ by the
requested host MAY ignore the Host header field value when determining
the resource identified by an HTTP/1.1 request"
?
You are quoting selectively. The same line continues with
"(But see section 19.6.1.1 for other requirements on Host support in
HTTP/1.1.)"
which section 19.6.1.1 is quite stern about the fact that HTTP 1.1
servers MUST support the Host: header properly.
So I persist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
