On 25 August 2010 15:23, Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>wrote:
> Again, this is partly because I feel a certain sense of order which > requires releases to be X.0.0. > > Why? And by "release" do you mean "stable, production-quality releases that we'll stake our reputations on" (in which case almost every x.0.0 would in reality fail the test) or do you mean "released outside the development team"? Not saying it's "wrong" (I tend to avoid "right" and "wrong" due to relativism), just interested by the expectation. Cheers, - Peter
