Hi Chris
Sorry about the delay in replying. I've been a bit busy with performance issues 
:)
The issue has come down to the vendor code persisting the cache as serialized 
objects to the file system and taking time to load it back, based on the 
decompiled code. The cache seems to be sufficiently tuned but for some reason, 
the file access is slow.
We haven't yet got the exact reason yet, so have to wait and see.
Vijay
From: vijay_me...@hotmail.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tomcat performance under low load
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:42:30 +1000








Thanks for the replies. Based on that, we did change the connectors to use 
executor threads. 
However, based on profiling the app, it turned out to be a code issue.
Thanks again.

From: vijay_me...@hotmail.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat performance under low load
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:35:14 +1000








Hi all
Thanks for reading this post. 
We are currently having 2 requirements that are opposites. The first 
requirement is performance under high loads and the other one is equivalent 
performance for 1 request.
Our prod env currently uses Apache with mod_jk and ajp 1.3 to Tomcat 6.0.26 and 
jdk 1.6.0_18 on solaris.
We're scaling to satisfactory loads of 250 concurrent requests serving pages in 
0.5 seconds.
The other test scenario is where the tomcat instance is kept idle and a single 
request is sent in every 90 or so seconds. In this case, the response takes 
about 8 seconds out of which about 6 seconds cannot be tracked.
As the result, what we're finding is that under high loads, it performs well 
but under very low loads, it does not.
This definitely happens in the tomcat layer as we've used the 
FastCommonAccessLogValve logger which gives the time for the request in Tomcat.
The connector properties are protocol="AJP/1.3" maxThreads="150" 
minSpareThreads="25" maxSpareThreads="75" acceptCount="100" 
connectionTimeout="20000" disableUploadTimeout="true" 
useBodyEncodingForURI="true".
I was wondering whether anyone would be able to help with this issue.
Thanks in advance
VM                                        

Reply via email to