-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ajay,
On 12/9/2010 11:29 AM, Aggarwal, Ajay wrote: > You are correct. I benchmarked in both directions and performance is > pretty comparable (http vs https). BTW, my application uses Java and > Apache HTTP Components library to perform these file transfers. > > While downloading from the server, I saw very similar %CPU and the > total time taken for download was also about the same. > > While uploading to the server, I saw that in my situation HTTP kept > %CPU in 60-80% range, while HTTPS was in 70-80% range... marginal > difference. And total time taken for upload via HTTPS was about 30% > more than via HTTP. > > I can live with this performance difference. A little data can go a long way toward setting priorities :) > I think we need to change Tomcat documentation slightly. See below > from tomcat 6.0 documentation > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/ssl-howto.html Section: > General Tips on Running SSL Patches -- even to the documentation -- are always welcome. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0BCjAACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBXTwCfXNt2YHSCEQJgccDscBZgZE0s LnwAoKLcdhqGoxNLNyCzchyCEJEWqx90 =4ksq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
