I meant servlet 3.0 async.
This is from CoyoteAdapter.java:
AsyncContextImpl asyncConImpl =
(AsyncContextImpl)request.getAsyncContext();
if (asyncConImpl != null) {
async = true;
} else if (!comet) {
response.finishResponse();
if (postParseSuccess) {
// Log only if processing was invoked.
// If postParseRequest() failed, it has already logged it.
((Context) request.getMappingData().context).logAccess(
request, response,
System.currentTimeMillis() - req.getStartTime(),
false);
}
req.action(ActionCode.POST_REQUEST , null);
}
In the async case logAccess() isn't called here. I've searched through the code
and don't see logAccess() being called anywhere else, except in error cases.
So, it looks like the async case is missing a call to logAccess() somewhere.
- Chris
On April 6, 2011 04:44:27 pm Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 20:50, Chris Dumoulin wrote:
> > In looking into this further, it appears that the difference isn't in HTTP
> > vs AJP, the difference is in async vs synchronous.
>
> When you say asynchronous, do you mean Servlet 3.0 or Comet?
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
