On 15/07/2011 22:25, Stephen Munro wrote: > Yeah, you may be right out it's usefulness, but on the video I watched, it > was being pitched as a performance boost if you had a massive web app (with > annotations and web-fragments). So the use case would be, develop the app > with annotations enabled and in production, switch them off and use the > master (generated) web.xml, that's what my understanding of it was. So, with > that in mind, I'd have thought a web.xml file would have been created and > that could be checked into version control without the user having to do > anything.
Does the video describe an app which is rebooted frequently in production? p > This may not be what had been envisioned for it's primary use, it just > struck me as a nice feature to have. > > On 15 July 2011 22:18, Jesse Farinacci <jie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Stephen Munro >> <stephen.ross.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks for the quick reply! I've got it working, so thanks. I'm a little >>> curious why the web-app structure is dumped directly to the logs rather >> than >>> have it written to a .xml for convenience say...web-generated.xml? >> >> Great! The configuration option name has "log" right in it. I wouldn't >> expect it to do anything other than log the effective web.xml. Having >> this effective web.xml output to a special file seems of limited >> value, you can simply copy and paste in the rare event that you >> actually require it. >> >> -Jesse >> >> -- >> There are 10 types of people in this world, those >> that can read binary and those that can not. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
