--- Caldarale, Charles R <chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> schrieb am Mo, 1.8.2011:
> it is obsolete in a way, because setting JAVA_HOME to JRE > gives the message : "NB: JAVA_HOME should point to a JDK > not a JRE". The message is correct as stated; when JAVA_HOME is used, it *must* point to a JDK. If you want a specific JRE, you must set JRE_HOME, not JAVA_HOME. If ::: Well, if JDK is not needed anymore, why bother setting JAVA_HOME, why is it mentioned at all ? > Why not only to set JRE_HOME ?!? Sorry, I can't parse that question. ::: I meant, if JDK is not needed anymore, why at all mentioning JAVA_HOME ? > the messaging seems at least to me a little confusing. Please explain why. As far as I can see, you set JAVA_HOME to a JRE, which is invalid; once you've done that, nothing useful can result. ::: Its all about JDK, if JDK is not needed anymore, why at all mentioning JAVA_HOME to JDK ?
