James Freysinger wrote in USMA 17261: >The angstrom (my apologies for not taking the time to insert the proper >diacrits) is not deprecated; rather, its "use is not encouraged". The >angstrom stands higher in the brochure than the cgs units, for some >reason. > >Jim
I suspect that the angstrom is not in Table 9 of CGS units because at 10^-8 cm it is hardly a CGS unit, and its use in the literature is more widespread than the units of Table 10. Joseph B.Reid 17 Glebe Road West Toronto M5P 1C8 TEL. 416-486-6071
