MessageJust curious, what are the remaining states that use metric in road
construction?
I understand that California and New York still use metric, and that
Pennsylvania is dual,
who are the others?


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Nat Hager III
  To: U.S. Metric Association
  Sent: Wednesday, 13 August, 2003 19:52
  Subject: [USMA:26597] Oregon DOT


  The only positive thing I see in this is that 14 states are still using
metric or dual units, as of October 2002.

  Nat



http://www.odot.state.or.us/techserv/engineer/pdu/Metric%20to%20english/Exec
.%20Deputy%20Director's%20memo%20to%20the%20dept.%20on%20conversion.htm


http://www.odot.state.or.us/techserv/engineer/pdu/Metric%20to%20english/engl
ishindex.htm


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  October 1, 2002



  To: All Highway Division Employees



  From: John Rosenberger, Executive Deputy Director

  Highway Division

  Subject: English Unit of Measurement Conversion

  The Oregon Department of Transportation will begin to convert back to the
English Unit of Measurement beginning now. This decision follows extensive
discussions with the Association of General Contractors (AGC) and the local
American Public Works Association (APWA) chapter. This conversion would make
the state consistent with Oregon cities and counties by using a single
measurement system for road construction projects.

  Let me give you some background about how we got to this point. In 1991,
Congress and the Federal Highway Administration mandated that all
federal-aid construction projects be in metric units by September 30, 1996.
ODOT began metric conversion in 1993 and started to contract metric projects
in 1996. Since then, Congress has removed the requirement that contract
plans be in metric units. After the removal of the metric requirement, most
states have reverted back to English, with Oregon being one of eight states
that still uses metric units. A total of 35 states use English measurements
and an additional seven states use a dual system. In addition, most cities
and counties in Oregon continued to use English measurements.

  The original intent of the federal mandate was to have all state Dot's
using metric measurements and even though ODOT believes the metric system to
be the most efficient system of measurement, it is more important to be in
alignment with other state DOTs and our local government partners.

  Below are some general timelines for ODOT's conversion to English units.

  January 2003 Begin contracting local projects and state consultant
projects in English units

  March 2003 Begin gathering survey information in English units

  July 2003 Begin development of state projects in English units

  April 2004 Begin contracting state projects in English units

  October 2005 Most projects contracted in English units

  This schedule doesn't dictate that projects be immediately converted from
metric to English. Each project is unique and will be evaluated individually
to determine whether to convert to English units or complete the project in
metric units. Project schedules will not be delayed for unit conversion.

  Local or consultant projects will need to be evaluated to determine if the
necessary English measurement contract support items, such as standard
drawings, are available (many support items will not be completely converted
until July 2003). Most likely the first state English unit projects
contracted will be simple preservation projects followed by more detailed
modernization projects.

  Beginning in October, Allison Hamilton, (503) 986-3558, will be heading up
ODOT's English conversion process. Allison will be forming an English
conversion committee and will need ODOT's full support in making a smooth
and timely transition from metric to English measurements.

  Cc: Central Services Division

  Communications Division

  Driver and Motor Vehicles Services Division

  Motor Carrier Transportation Division

  Public Transit Division

  Rail Division

  Traffic Safety Division

  Transportation Development Division




Reply via email to