Yes, the correct symbol (lower case except for proper-name units) is required 
of FDA-regulated products.  See item 4B, Symbols, at  

http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/ucm073844.htm

I can testify to this on the prescription drug side, because I personally see 
(and, of course, I look for this) manufacturers'  drug product labeling using 
correct symbolism consistently.  But I don't know how vigorous the policing of 
food product is. The Woodbury School article cited below deals with a bag of 
chips.  

Individual pharmacy prescription labels are another story.  There has not yet 
been an effort to police what unit symbolism is required by each state on the 
presciption vials you get from your pharmacist.  That is a state function. At 
the least, it would require some software tweaking.

Paul
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Hooper 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: 03 November, 2010 09:20
  Subject: [USMA:48751] proof reading labels


  In the article referred to in the message from John Steele:


    Story about a 7th grade class that reviews products for labeling errors 
involving metric usage, and writes letters to the company.
    http://www.woodburybulletin.com/event/article/id/36511/group/homepage/


  there was the following comment:
    Victor Ding and Nick Konrad ... (pointed) out the misusage of a capital ā€œGā€ 
for grams. However, the company informed the boys that the usage was in fact 
correct through approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.



  Does anyone know if the US Food & Drug Admin. really sanctions or even 
requires the incorrect use of the capital "G" for grams, and discourages or 
perhaps forbids the correct lower case "g"?



  Bill Hooper
  73 kg body mass*
  Fernandina Beach, Florida, USA


  * plus or minus a kilogram or so.



Reply via email to