Forwarded is Elizabeth Gentry's reply to my question about the accuracy of my 
two summary statements on metric-only labeling as permitted individually by 
forty nine of the fifty states of the US, except the State of New York.

Eugene Mechtly
________________________________
From: Gentry, Elizabeth [elizabeth.gen...@nist.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 3:07 PM
To: mechtly, eugene a
Cc: keneth.butc...@nist.gov; Crown, Linda D.; Sefcik, David; Warfield, Lisa
Subject: RE: Almost Unanimous Metric-Only Labeling


Eugene Mechtly,



Thank you for your question regarding the status of metric labeling in the 
United States.  Ken Butcher is currently out of the office, but has asked me to 
respond to your inquiry.



Yes - Currently 49 of the 50 states permit the use of only metric units on 
packages that are subject to their jurisdiction (e.g., not under the 
jurisdiction of the federal Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, FPLA).  The only 
remaining state to require dual unit labeling is New York.  State metric 
labeling can be permitted by law, regulation, and/or policy.  Adopting the 
model Uniform Packaging and Labeling Regulation (UPLR, 1999 or later version) 
is one method that can be used to permit metric labeling within a state.


Best regards,





Elizabeth J. Gentry

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Office of Weights and Measures

Laws and Metric Program

100 Bureau Drive Stop 2600

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-2600

301-975-3690  Fax: 301-975-8091

http://www.nist.gov/metric



-----Original Message-----
From: mechtly, eugene a [mailto:mech...@illinois.edu]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 12:49 PM
To: keneth.butc...@nist.gov; Crown, Linda D.; Sefcik, David; Warfield, Lisa; 
Gentry, Elizabeth
Cc: U.S. Metric Accociation; mechtly, eugene a
Subject: Almost Unanimous Metric-Only Labeling



Forty Nine states of the United States of America presently permit Metric-Only 
Labeling of products which are entirely under state jurisdiction, but not under 
the jurisdiction of the federal Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA), by 
virtue of individual state laws, regulations, or policies, if not by formal 
adoption of the NCWM-NIST Uniform Packaging and Labeling Regulation (UPLR).



The only remaining exception is the State of New York which continues to 
require dual-unit labeling.



Are the above two statements accurate?



Eugene Mechtly

Reply via email to