I was just going through the docs, updating examples to 3.0 syntax. I fell over something that bothered me:
https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/faq/general.html#troubleshooting Has a section on increasing hit_for_pass ttl. I discussed rewriting this section with DocWilco on irc, and we came to the conclusion that the current default vcl may not be completely sane. For example, it looks like a 500 will cause varnish to hit_for_pass for the next two minutes, even though the next request could result in a nice cacheable 200. Any ideas? Was this already considered when writing the default? -- Andreas _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
