In message <2837.1250697...@critter.freebsd.dk>, "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: >In message <4a8bb076.50...@gmail.com>, Rob S writes:
Just to follow up to myself after trying to hack up a solution in -trunk: >I seem to recall that the locking is benign. Make that "Mostly benign" :-) >Probably the more interesting question is how aggressive you want it to >be: if it is too militant, it will cause a lot of needless disk activity. There was actually a far more interesting question, or rather issue: The lurker thread does not have a HTTP request. That means that we can not evaluate a ban test like "req.url ~ foo": we simply don't have a req.url to compare with. So provided you only have obj.* tests in your bans, it is possible, for req.* tests it is a no go... The obvious workaround is evident, store the req.* fields you need in obscure obj.* headers (possibly stripping them in vcl_deliver). With that caveat, give r4206 a shot if you dare... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
