On Friday 23 January 2009 at 9:17 am, Brett Serkez penned about "Re: [vbox-users] Run VirtualBox as a service in Windows"
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:40 AM, vbox <v...@skolesys.dk> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:50:12 -0300, fcassia <fcas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Brett Serkez <bser...@gmail.com> wrote: > <snip> > >>> I was wondering if anyone else felt that perhaps there is an > >>> architectural issue with VBox in this area? Seems to me that perhaps > >>> VBox should be a service > >> > >> NO please don´t. I don´t like decisions like these being forced on > >> users just because someone has ¨special needs¨. > > Wanted to clarify. I didn't ask the question as I was looking for > "special needs" cases and I wouldn't suggest an architectural change > for such exceptional cases, rather I see this being potentially > significant over the long-term in holding back the usefulness of VBox > as I think it is likely to emerge over time that what might appear to > be an exceptional case now might not be in the future. > Hi Brett, I think your idea has merit. However, I think what others are objecting to (and I as well) is the proposal of changing VBox to make it run as a service. Why can't the two peacefully coexist: VBox GUI and VBox as a Service? Cheers, -- Pablo Sanchez - Blueoak Database Engineering, Inc Ph: 819.459.1926 Fax: 760.860.5225 (US) _______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list vbox-users@virtualbox.org http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
