Hi, ,- - [ Le mercredi 18 avril 2007 vers 9:33 tonix (Antonio Nati) écrivait: ] - - |
> I don't see any reason to check for the content > of alias, looking for a "bouncing" string. Apart > .qmail-default, I don't see a reason why a > .qmail-ALIAS should contain a bouncing string. There is for me a reason : when using a catch-all if you want to disable some specific address... i know that actually if the .qmail-default specify a catch-all, chkuser does not look further and accept the mail, but it should be easy in that case to still verify if the specific user is not configured to bounce... Anyway, for me, if a .qmail-xyz specify "bounce-no-mailbox" for any reason, i do not see why chkuser should accept the mail and let qmail bounce it as it's easy to avoid... it's an opengate for spammers. | `- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Bien à vous... _ (_' L'informatique est ma passion, vous la simplifier, mon métier ! ,_)téphane Bouvard [antarex AT freenet DOT be] http://www.antarex.be
