On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 19:05 -0700, Rick Widmer wrote: > > Christopher Chan wrote: > > > >> Public Domain. That is a valid choice on SouceForge. > >> > > > > :-) > > > >> > >>> I hope you can garner more support. > >> > >> Me too... We'll see I'm about to reply to you on the qmail list and > >> we'll see what happens... > >> > > > > Well, now that Charles has responded... > > > > You did previously say that you would rather not have a qmail > > specifically for vpopmail. Are you going to stick to that? > > Yes. As far as I am concerned, the project is not possible without the > support of the major qmail players. I will probably see about shutting > it down. > > > At the > > moment, I do not see netqmail adding support for user verification at > > rcpt to time in the near future... > > We'll see what happens. I haven't had a chance to look at netqmail-1.06 > yet, but I see it is now out. > > > Rick > > >
it appears 1.06 is for legal purposes only...no changes to the codebase. this is an excerpt from the top of netqmail-1.06/CHANGES 20071130 version: netqmail 1.06 20071130 legal: qmail-1.03 is now in the public domain 20051103 doc: dot-qmail.9 updated for changed (19980613) ... btw the link on the homepage http://www.qmail.org/netqmail/CHANGES still references the changelog from 1.05, but inside http://www.qmail.org/netqmail-1.06.tar.gz tarball there is an updated CHANGES file. -- aichains <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> !DSPAM:4757785e32001514716618!
